Tadvana Narayanan
While some asset managers believe that we are not in the scale of the 2008 financial crisis, others believe a real estate recession could be in the offing on the heels of a perfect storm of rising interest rates forcing assets to reprice down.
- Rising Defaults: The CRE industry, already shaken by COVID-19 and turbulent banking sectors, is grappling with rising defaults due to rising interest rates, impacting property values and lending standards.
- Big Players Walk Away: Large property owners are walking away from their investments as portfolios no longer meet investor requirements and generate adequate returns.
- Banks Brace for Impact: US banks, once considered resilient to CRE defaults, are now preparing to sell off property loans at a discount to reduce their exposure, reflecting their waning confidence in the market.
In a market already shaken by COVID-19 and turmoil in the regional banking sector, we believe that the CRE industry might be poised for a real crisis the likes of which hasn’t been seen since the ‘90s. Rising interest rates have wrought lower property values, higher borrowing cost and tighter lending standards which has already led to lower loan origination volume and unprecedented slashes in deal issuance.
On the secondary as well as securitized fronts, the news is just as bleak, with even top property owners like Brookfield and Blackstone running for the hills on their existing loan portfolios. Brookfield recently defaulted on more than $750 million of debt in their Brookfield DTLA Fund tied to two trophy office buildings in downtown Los Angeles. Blackstone sent two separate loans on Manhattan office and residential buildings to special servicing, and they are not the only ones.
Losses in private label CMBS are on the rise with several notable office and retail loans being liquidated in the past few months at higher than ever loss severities as can be seen below in the table generated by Yield Book Research. In the last year, two Class A office towers in Houston’s Energy corridor – Two Westlake Park in WFRBS 2014-C24 and Three Westlake Park in GSMS 2014-GC20, had realized losses of 82% and 88% and these are just one of many such examples of troubled trophy office assets in locations such as Houston, San Francisco and Manhattan. More recently, 470 Broadway which was securitized in MSBAM 2012-C6 was liquidated with an even higher loss severity of 93.2%. And to add to the sectors troubles, Multifamily which was hitherto considered a haven of CRE has also begun to show cracks as valuations of apartment buildings fell nearly 15% by the beginning of the second quarter of this year and rising debt costs threaten to wipe out many Multifamily owners across the country.
Non-Agency CMBS Loan Losses in Last 12 Months
Aug-22 | Sep-22 | Oct-22 | Nov-22 | Dec-22 | Jan-23 | Feb-23 | Mar-23 | Apr-23 | May-23 | Jun-23 | Jul-23 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# Liquidations | 15 | 15 | 10 | 9 | 17 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 2 |
Disposed Amount ($m) | 216.9 | 342.1 | 228.1 | 260.8 | 189.5 | 170.3 | 108.9 | 205.1 | 55.6 | 79.7 | 230.7 | 26.8 |
Disposed Amount with Realized Loss > 0 ($m) | 194.8 | 301.6 | 228.1 | 260.8 | 183.5 | 160.4 | 108.9 | 197.5 | 55.6 | 79.7 | 230.7 | 26.8 |
Realized Loss ($m) | 85.7 | 113.2 | 85.3 | 187.6 | 82.1 | 92.2 | 42.6 | 97.5 | 23.3 | 24.3 | 143.4 | 16.2 |
Loss Severity (For Loans with Loss > 0) | 44% | 38% | 37% | 72% | 45% | 57% | 39% | 49% | 42% | 30% | 62% | 61% |
Percent of Retail and Hotel Disposed Amount | 86% | 80% | 81% | 63% | 58% | 88% | 91% | 98% | 61% | 93% | 84% | 100% |
Source: Trepp. Yield Book September 2023
In a list identified by data provider and LSEGH partner Trepp, approximately $7.7 billion of office loans, more than a quarter of which are owned by big-name institutions, are now in special servicing. This begs the question. Why are these powerful landlords and owners just walking away and how will this impact the larger CRE market including lenders and investors alike?
Compared to smaller property managers who have more skin in the game, larger borrowers do not wish to hang on to buildings long term, nor does looming foreclosure seem to be as much of a deterrent. Clearly, they have deeper pockets and more of a willingness to cut their losses given that the portfolios are not generating the kinds of returns they once were and no longer satisfy their investor requirements. Additionally, with rising rates, for large loan floaters with expiring interest rate caps the dramatic increase in the cost of protection through interest rate hedges is a cause for concern.
And what about lenders and investors? Until now, the general belief has been that the ones most negatively impacted by the defaults of these big office towers and multi-family properties were not the US commercial banks but the holders CMBS and specialized CRE lenders. Until now being the key. It looks like the crisis has deepened to the point where we are now seeing US banks bracing for impact as they prepare to sell off property loans at discount to reduce their CRE exposure. Banks like HSBC USA, PacWest and Wells Fargo are off-loading debt at a discount even when borrowers are up to date, a sign of their lack of faith in the once stalwart CRE market.
And to add to the existing woes of almost all the players in CRE, we see a wall of debt scheduled for repayment in the coming years. Almost $1.5 trillion of US CRE debt comes due before the end of 2025. “Refinancing risks are front and center”, for owners of properties from office buildings to stores to warehouses, according to Morgan Stanley analyst James Egan who continues to say, “the maturity wall here is front-loaded. So are the associated risks”. The graph below shows a breakout of the US CRE debt coming for refinance in the next 7 years, rather ominously highlighting that nearly half is coming due in the next 3 years.
47% of U.S. CRE debt maturing between 2023 and 2030 is expected to be repaid in the next 3 years.
With funding becoming more expensive and no revenue to be found anywhere, lenders need higher yield which was traditionally through high interest CRE loans. But with credit becoming more and more of an issue as borrowers demonstrate their willingness to walk away, the big question is, will lenders want to swap their revenue problems for credit problems?
With all these different factors in play, while some asset managers believe that we are not in the scale of the 2008 financial crisis, others believe a real estate recession could be in the offing on the heels of a perfect storm of rising interest rates forcing assets to reprice down.
Legal Disclaimer
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2023 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.